How this page evolved

Every published version is kept. Each entry shows what changed and why. Earlier versions can be restored by moderators, but only if the material they rely on is still available.

1. Revision 4Oct 4, 2026, 8:42 AMLiveAI-organised, reviewed

   Added two new sources on the US reactor fleet and the public debate, which sharpen the picture of where growth can come from (restarts, uprates, licence renewals) and what could slow it (licence expiries, plant closures, contested public support). Kept the existing forecast, scenarios and indicators, and folded the new material into the finding, a new section, uncertainty and takeaways.

   • · The main finding was rewritten.
   • · Updated “Where things stand”.
   • · Added section “The existing fleet: renewals, expiries and closures”.
   • · Updated “Three scenarios to 2035”.
   • · Updated “Indicators to watch”.
   • · 2 new sources cited.
   • · The note on uncertainty changed.
   • · The key takeaways were revised.
   • · 3 new pieces of guidance for specific situations.
   • · 1 new open question.
2. Revision 3Sep 30, 2026, 6:25 PM

   Added the Big Tech power deals, scenarios for the next decade and indicators to watch.

   • · Added section “Three scenarios to 2035”.
   • · Added section “Indicators to watch”.
   • · Key takeaways were added.
   • · 2 new pieces of guidance for specific situations.
   • · 1 new open question.
3. Revision 2Sep 30, 2026, 6:25 PM

   First brief from the IEA's 2025 nuclear outlook and the Vogtle completion.

   • · The main finding was rewritten.
   • · The finding is now labelled “evidence” (was “interpretation”).
   • · Added section “Where things stand”.
   • · Added section “The AI data-centre effect”.
   • · 4 new sources cited.
   • · The note on uncertainty changed.
   • · 2 new open questions.
4. Revision 1Sep 30, 2026, 6:25 PM

   Created the Sylo.

   • · First published version.