How dangerous are asteroid impacts to Earth?
Asteroid risk is real but mostly comes from small and medium objects, not an imminent global catastrophe.
Covers: This page covers the frequency and severity of asteroid impacts on Earth, from small meteor events to potential global catastrophes, and the current scientific understanding of impact hazards. It does not provide instructions for deflecting asteroids or speculate about unconfirmed threats.
3 free full reads left this month. Join or upgrade
The short answer
Evidence-backed AI-prepared starting mapAsteroid impact risk is real but, on the evidence available, dominated by small and medium objects rather than imminent global catastrophe. Asteroid 2024 YR4, about 60 m across, briefly reached a 3% chance of hitting Earth on 22 December 2032 — one of the most significant impact risks ever detected — before further observations ruled out an Earth impact; a 4% chance of a lunar impact remains. For the wider near-Earth object population, long-term orbit modelling rules out Earth-orbit crossing within the next 1000 years for a large fraction of objects. A Bennu-type medium asteroid strike, estimated at 0.037% probability in 2182, is modelled to inject up to 400 million tons of stratospheric dust, cooling global mean temperatures by about 4°C and cutting precipitation by 15%, with net primary productivity falling up to 36% on land and 25% in the oceans.123
- Evidence 18
In brief
A 60 m asteroid, 2024 YR4, briefly carried a 3% chance of hitting Earth in 2032 — one of the highest impact risks ever detected — before observations ruled out an Earth impact; a 4% lunar impact chance remains.1
Evidence-backedFor a large fraction of near-Earth objects, orbit modelling rules out crossing Earth's orbit within the next 1000 years.2
Evidence-backedA Bennu-type strike (0.037% chance in 2182) is modelled to cool global mean temperatures by about 4°C, cut precipitation 15%, and reduce land and ocean productivity by up to 36% and 25%.3
Evidence-backedNo region is resilient against every kind of global catastrophe; Australia performs best across the reviewed scenarios, but still depends on international cooperation and trade.4
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
3%
3 in every 100
4%
4 in every 100
0%
0 in every 100
- Drop in global precipitation15%
- Fall in ocean productivity25%
- Fall in land productivity36%
The evidence behind it
4 sources- Other studies and data4
Published in 2025 and 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| No Place to Hide? Regional Resilience and Vulnerability to Global Catastrophic Risk. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| The Impact Hazard Assessment for Near-Earth Asteroid 2024 YR4. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| The Hazardous NEOs of the Future: Long-term Predictions under Uncertainty. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Climatic and ecological responses to Bennu-type asteroid collisions. | Other studies and data | 2025 |
The community around it
- Contributions
- 0
- People
- 0
- Following
- 0
Nobody has added anything yet. Experience, evidence or a different view would show up here.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you want to know whether a newly detected asteroid is a real threat
watch how the impact probability moves as more observations arrive: for 2024 YR4 it first rose, then fell to zero as Earth moved out of the uncertainty region.1
Evidence-backedIf you are following the 2024 YR4 story
the Earth impact is ruled out, but a 4% lunar impact probability on 22 December 2032 remains open until new astrometric data, possibly around 2028.1
Evidence-backedIf you are assessing very long-term asteroid risk
most of the NEO population can be ruled out from crossing Earth's orbit in the next 1000 years, and the remainder can be ranked for tracking priority by how long their MOID stays low and how frequent their close encounters are.2
Evidence-backedIf you are thinking about consequences of a medium-sized strike rather than the impact itself
expect climate and food-system effects — about 4°C cooling, 15% less precipitation, and productivity losses up to 36% on land and 25% in the ocean — not just local blast damage.3
Evidence-backedIf you are weighing where to live or invest for resilience to global catastrophes
geographic isolation, food self-sufficiency, high governance quality and decentralisation recur as protective factors, but they trade off against each other and no location is resilient to every scenario.4
Evidence-backedIf you are deciding what preparation is worth supporting
the reviewed literature points to investment in food security, national risk assessments, and international agreements for preparation and response.4
Evidence-backedThe full story · 4 chapters
01
The 2024 YR4 scare: how a 3% risk was resolved
AI summary:Asteroid 2024 YR4 briefly showed a 3% Earth impact chance for 2032, but that is now ruled out, leaving a 4% lunar chance.
Evidence-backed: Asteroid 2024 YR4 was discovered by the ATLAS survey on 27 December 2024 and became one of the most significant impact risks ever detected. At roughly 60 m in size, it reached a 3% probability of impacting Earth on 22 December 2032. Three impact monitoring systems — Sentry, Aegis and NEODyS — tracked it. The orbit solution proved remarkably stable, and the impact probability behaved as expected as uncertainty shrank: it first rose while Earth sat in the core of the uncertainty region, then fell as Earth moved toward the tail and eventually outside it. An Earth impact has now been ruled out.1
Evidence-backed: One possibility is not yet closed: there remains a 4% probability of a lunar impact on 22 December 2032. Confirming or, more likely, ruling that out requires new astrometric data, for example during the 2028 apparition.1
02
Long-term risk across the near-Earth object population
AI summary:Orbit modelling rules out Earth-orbit crossing within 1000 years for many near-Earth objects, and ranks the rest for tracking.
Evidence-backed: Predicting impacts far into the future is limited by orbital uncertainty: as an orbit is propagated forward, uncertainty in an object's position grows faster than uncertainty in its minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID). Where the MOID is low but the position along the orbit is unknown, researchers compute an analytical approximation of how often close encounters occur at a given distance, propagating many samples from the initial orbital uncertainty distribution.2
Evidence-backed: Applied to the NEO population, this approach rules out crossing Earth's orbit within the next 1000 years for a large fraction of objects. For the rest, objects are ranked by how long their MOID stays low, the long-term frequency of close encounters, and that frequency relative to the background rate for objects of similar size. These rankings identify which NEOs should be prioritised for future tracking and orbit refinement. The method was demonstrated and validated on 99942 Apophis, whose MOID is slowly increasing but still allows future deep encounters.2
03
What a medium-sized strike would do to climate and ecosystems
AI summary:A Bennu-type strike is modelled to cool the globe, cut rainfall, and reduce land and ocean productivity.
Evidence-backed: For asteroid Bennu there is an estimated 0.037% chance of collision with Earth in 2182. Simulations of such a medium-sized strike, injecting up to 400 million tons of dust into the stratosphere, show marked disruptions to climate, atmospheric chemistry and global photosynthesis. Global mean temperatures are projected to drop by 4°C and global precipitation to fall by 15%. The largest relative reductions in global terrestrial and marine net primary productivity reach 36% and 25% respectively. Depending on the asteroid's iron content and subsequent marine dust deposition, large diatom blooms occur in iron-limited regions such as the Southern Ocean and the eastern equatorial Pacific.3
04
Resilience and vulnerability if a global catastrophe occurs
AI summary:No place is resilient to every global catastrophe; Australia fares best, but cooperation and trade remain essential.
Evidence-backed: A review of global catastrophic risk scenarios finds no place on Earth resilient against all kinds of such risk. Australia shows resilience across the widest range of scenarios in the reviewed literature, but even for it, continued international cooperation and trade are essential. The resilience factors that recur most across different risks are geographic isolation (for example islands), self-sufficiency especially in food production, high governance quality (more democratic and lower inequality), and decentralisation to avoid single points of failure such as those affecting trade or food supply.4
Evidence-backed: These factors stand in tension with one another, so trade-offs are needed — between different catastrophe scenarios, and between resilience to immediate impacts versus longer-term consequences. The literature suggests greater resilience requires more investment in preparation (such as food security), planning (such as national risk assessments), and international agreements that facilitate cooperation on preparation and response.4
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1The Impact Hazard Assessment for Near-Earth Asteroid 2024 YR4.The journal of the astronautical sciences (Farnocchia et al.)Published Mar 5, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“Discovered by the ATLAS survey on December 27, 2024, asteroid 2024 YR4 represented one of the most significant impact risks ever detected. Roughly 60 m in size, this asteroid reached a 3% probability of impacting the Earth on December 22, 2032. We discuss the orbit and impact analyses carried by the three impact monitoring systems Sentry, Aegis, and NEODyS. The orbit solution proved to be remarkably stable and the impact probability behaved according to expectations as the uncertainty decreased thanks to additional observations, i.e., the impact probability initially increased as the Earth remained within the core of the uncertainty region and then dropped as the Earth moved towards the tail and eventually outside of the uncertainty region. Although the risk of an Earth impact has been ruled out, there remains a 4% probability of a lunar impact on December 22, 2032. To confirm or more likely rule out that possibility, we need to wait until new astrometric data become available, e.g., during the 2028 apparition.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40295-026-00576-0.”
- 2The Hazardous NEOs of the Future: Long-term Predictions under Uncertainty.The journal of the astronautical sciences (Fuentes-Muñoz et al.)Published Jul 7, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“As the orbit is propagated into the future, the uncertainty in position grows faster than the uncertainty in the MOID. If the MOID is low but the position along the orbit is unknown, we compute an analytical approximation of the frequency of close encounters for a given distance. The NEO population spreads widely in orbital uncertainty, which we consider by propagating multiple samples from the initial orbital uncertainty distribution. We demonstrate and validate the methodology for 99942 Apophis, whose MOID is secularly increasing at a slow rate that still allows for future deep encounters. We apply this methodology to the NEO population, and for a large fraction we rule out the crossing of Earth's orbit in the next 1000 years. Otherwise, we rank NEOs in terms of how long their MOID will be low, long-term frequency of close encounters, and frequency relative to the background close encounter frequency for objects of similar size. These rankings identify NEOs that should be prioritized for future tracking and orbit refinement.”
- 3Climatic and ecological responses to Bennu-type asteroid collisions.Science advances (Dai & Timmermann)Published Feb 5, 2025Checked Oct 4, 2026
“There is an estimated chance of 0.037% that asteroid Bennu will collide with Earth in 2182 CE. The potential collision of such medium-sized asteroids can inject massive amounts of dust into the atmosphere, with unknown consequences for terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Here, we use the coupled high-top Community Earth System Model Version 2 with interactive chemistry to investigate how medium-sized asteroid strikes would affect climate, vegetation, and marine productivity. Our simulations, which inject up to 400 million tons of dust into the stratosphere, show marked disruptions in climate, atmospheric chemistry, and global photosynthesis. Global mean temperatures are projected to drop by 4°C, and global precipitation decreases by 15% in our simulations. The largest relative reductions in global terrestrial and marine net primary productivity reach 36 and 25%, respectively. Depending on the iron amount of the asteroid and the subsequent marine dust deposition, large diatom blooms occur in iron-limited regions such as the Southern Ocean and the eastern equatorial Pacific.”
- 4No Place to Hide? Regional Resilience and Vulnerability to Global Catastrophic Risk.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) (Jehn et al.)Published Aug 23, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“This shows there is no place on Earth which is resilient against all kinds of GCR. Australia shows resilience across the widest range of GCR scenarios in the literature we reviewed, but even for it, continued international cooperation and trade are essential. Across the different risks, common resilience factors that show up most are geographic isolation (e.g. islands), self-sufficiency (especially in food production), high governance quality (more democratic and lower inequality) and decentralization to mitigate single point catastrophic failures (e.g. impacting trade or food supply). Many of these factors stand in tension with each other and trade-offs are required to balance between different GCR scenarios and between a higher resilience against the immediate impacts or against the longer-term consequences. The literature suggests that increased GCR resilience requires more investment in preparation (e.g., food security), planning (e.g., national risk assessments), and international agreements that facilitate cooperation on preparation and GCR response.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 4, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 4, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
“The 2024 YR4 scare: how a 3% risk was resolved” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
“Long-term risk across the near-Earth object population” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
“What a medium-sized strike would do to climate and ecosystems” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
“Resilience and vulnerability if a global catastrophe occurs” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
Open questions
Will asteroid 2024 YR4 hit the Moon on 22 December 2032? The 4% probability stands until new astrometric data, possibly from the 2028 apparition, confirm or rule it out.
No answers yet
Which near-Earth objects should be prioritised for tracking and orbit refinement, based on how long their minimum orbit intersection distance stays low and how often they have close encounters?
No answers yet
What are the consequences of a medium-sized asteroid strike for terrestrial and marine ecosystems, and how much do they depend on the asteroid's iron content and marine dust deposition?
No answers yet
How should societies balance resilience factors that stand in tension — such as geographic isolation versus international trade and cooperation — across different catastrophe scenarios?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.