Does learning a musical instrument make children smarter?
Music training clearly helps music-related skills, but broad gains in intelligence and school achievement are not proven and may just reflect which children take up music.
Covers: This page reviews evidence on whether musical training causally boosts general cognitive skills, IQ, and academic achievement in children. It does not cover music therapy for clinical conditions or the intrinsic benefits of musical enjoyment.
3 free full reads left this month. Join or upgrade

The short answer
Interpretation AI-prepared starting mapThe evidence is genuinely contested. Observational and pre-post studies report that children with instrumental training outperform peers on vocabulary, nonverbal reasoning, auditory discrimination and fine motor skills, and one small study found a 7-point IQ gain in an extracurricular music group versus 4.3 points in a school-music group. But a multilevel meta-analysis that controlled for study quality found the overall effect of music training programs to be essentially zero and consistent across outcomes, ages and training durations, with small positive effects appearing only in studies without random allocation and with non-active controls.123
- Evidence 13
- Interpretation 5
In brief
Observational and pre-post studies link childhood instrumental training to better vocabulary, nonverbal reasoning, auditory discrimination and fine motor skills, with training duration predicting outcomes.1
Evidence-backedOne small pre-post study found a 7-point IQ rise in an extracurricular music group versus 4.3 points in a school music group, but no effects on memory, visual-motor integration or socio-emotional behaviour.2
Evidence-backedA multilevel meta-analysis controlling for study quality found the overall effect of music training on cognitive and academic outcomes to be essentially zero, with small effects only in non-randomised studies using non-active controls.3
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
- Extracurricular music7 IQ points
- School music4.3 IQ points
19 children per group
4.6 years
The evidence behind it
9 sources- Reviews of many studies2
- Other studies and data6
- Background1
When it was published
Newest from 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| How musical training affects cognitive development: rhythm, reward and other modulating variables | Other studies and data | 2014 |
| Practicing a Musical Instrument in Childhood is Associated with Enhanced Verbal Ability and Nonverbal Reasoning | Other studies and data | 2008 |
| Measuring the impact of musical learning on cognitive, behavioural and socio-emotional wellbeing development in children | Other studies and data | 2017 |
| Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysis | Reviews of many studies | 2020 |
| Music education (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
| The impact of musical training on reading ability in children: the mediating role of working memory. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Music participation, global cortical morphometry, and later language outcomes in the ABCD study. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Effects of music training in executive function performance in children: A systematic review. | Reviews of many studies | 2022 |
| Musical training is associated with cognitive outcomes and white matter microstructure in middle childhood. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
The community around it
- Contributions
- 0
- People
- 0
- Following
- 0
Nobody has added anything yet. Experience, evidence or a different view would show up here.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you are choosing an activity mainly to raise your child's IQ or test scores
the strongest controlled evidence does not support that expectation, so treat cognitive gain as an unlikely primary reason to enrol.3
Evidence-backedIf you want your child to build auditory discrimination, fine motor control and sustained practice habits
instrumental training is associated with gains in those music-adjacent skills, and longer training predicts stronger outcomes.1
Evidence-backedIf you are weighing an extracurricular programme against school music lessons
one small study found a larger IQ increase in the extracurricular group, but the sample was 19 children per group and the result should not be treated as settled.2
Evidence-backedIf you are deciding when to start
some researchers argue that earlier initiation during sensitive periods yields larger effects, though this modulating factor has not been isolated in controlled trials.4
Evidence-backedIf you read claims that music practice raises ACT or SAT scores
that claim appears in general overview material without primary data, and it conflicts with meta-analytic findings, so check the underlying study before relying on it.53
InterpretationIf your child is motivated by music and enjoys the social context of lessons
motivation, reward and social context are identified as important factors in long-term benefit, independent of any general cognitive gain.4
Evidence-backedThe full story · 2 chapters
01
What the studies actually report
AI summary:Observational and pre-post studies report advantages in vocabulary, reasoning and motor skills, while a quality-controlled meta-analysis finds the overall effect near zero.
Evidence-backed: Children who received at least three years of instrumental training (mean 4.6 years) outperformed controls on auditory discrimination and fine motor skills, and also on vocabulary and nonverbal reasoning; duration of training predicted these outcomes. The same study found no association with spatial skills, phonemic awareness, or mathematical ability.1
Evidence-backed: In a pre-post comparison, children given extracurricular musical training (n = 19) showed a 7-point IQ increase versus 4.3 points for a statutory school music group (n = 19). No effects appeared for memory, visual-motor integration, or socio-emotional behaviour, but the extracurricular group improved on the aiming-and-catching composite of a motor assessment.2
Evidence-backed: A multilevel meta-analysis found the overall effect of music training programs to be approximately zero once study design quality was controlled for, and highly consistent across studies. Small significant effects (around g = 0.20) appeared only in studies without random allocation and with non-active controls. The authors report the training was ineffective regardless of outcome type, participant age, or training duration, and note that cross-sectional evidence also shows no impact on non-music cognitive skills or academic achievement.3
Evidence-backed: A review argues that musical training produces both near and far transfer effects, that brain adaptation correlates with intensity and duration of practice, and that timing of musical initiation matters because of sensitive periods. It proposes rhythmic entrainment as a mechanism supporting executive function, temporal processing and attention, which could underlie reported gains in reading and verbal memory. It also stresses that motivation, reward and social context of music education are important but neglected factors.4
Evidence-backed: A general overview of music education states that practising musical skills has been shown to benefit students in other academic areas and on standardised tests such as the ACT and SAT. This is a summary claim without primary data attached, and it sits in tension with the meta-analytic null result.5
Do you think learning to play a musical instrument improves children's cognitive abilities or academic performance?
Your individual response is private. Only totals are shown.
02
How to read the disagreement
AI summary:The disagreement mostly comes down to study design: positive results appear in non-randomised or small pre-post groups, and fade with random allocation and active controls.
Interpretation: The split is largely about study design. Positive findings come from children who chose or were selected into music, or from small pre-post groups, where prior ability, family resources and motivation are not equalised. When allocation is randomised and controls are active, the advantage largely disappears. That pattern is what you would expect if music training mainly selects or motivates children who were already doing well, rather than causing broad cognitive gains.123
Interpretation: It is possible that both sides are partly right: music training may reliably improve music-adjacent skills such as auditory discrimination and fine motor control, while general intelligence and academic achievement are much harder to move. The near-transfer findings are more consistent across sources than the far-transfer ones.14
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1Practicing a Musical Instrument in Childhood is Associated with Enhanced Verbal Ability and Nonverbal ReasoningPLoS ONE (Forgeard et al.)Published Oct 28, 2008Checked Sep 30, 2026
“In this study we investigated the association between instrumental music training in childhood and outcomes closely related to music training as well as those more distantly related. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Children who received at least three years (M = 4.6 years) of instrumental music training outperformed their control counterparts on two outcomes closely related to music (auditory discrimination abilities and fine motor skills) and on two outcomes distantly related to music (vocabulary and nonverbal reasoning skills). Duration of training also predicted these outcomes. Contrary to previous research, instrumental music training was not associated with heightened spatial skills, phonemic awareness, or mathematical abilities. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: While these results are correlational only, the strong predictive effect of training duration suggests that instrumental music training may enhance auditory discrimination, fine motor skills, vocabulary, and nonverbal reasoning. Alternative explanations for these results are discussed.”
- 2Measuring the impact of musical learning on cognitive, behavioural and socio-emotional wellbeing development in childrenPsychology of Music (Rose et al.)Published Dec 13, 2017Checked Sep 30, 2026
“Pre- and post-test measures of intelligence, memory, socio-emotional behaviour, motor ability and visual-motor integration were compared in children who received either extra-curricular musical training (EMT: n = 19) or statutory school music group lessons (SSM: n = 19). Results showed a significant association between musical aptitude and intelligence overall. The EMT group showed a significant increase in IQ (7 points), in comparison to 4.3 points for the SSM group, suggesting an effect of musical learning on intelligence. No effects were found for memory, or for visual motor integration or socio-emotional behaviour. However, significant improvements in gross motor ability where revealed for the EMT group only, for the aiming and catching composite. With regard to the measure of fluid intelligence, these findings support previous studies. The novel use of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children provides evidence that musical learning may support development in a child’s ability to judge distance, consider velocity, focus and use their proprioceptive, interoceptive and exteroceptive nervous systems.”
- 3Cognitive and academic benefits of music training with children: A multilevel meta-analysisMemory & Cognition (Sala & Gobet)Published Jul 29, 2020Checked Sep 30, 2026
“Once the quality of study design is controlled for, the overall effect of music training programs is null ( $$ \overline{g} $$ g ¯ ≈ 0) and highly consistent across studies ( τ 2 ≈ 0). Results of Bayesian analyses employing distributional assumptions (informative priors) derived from previous research in cognitive training corroborate these conclusions. Small statistically significant overall effects are obtained only in those studies implementing no random allocation of participants and employing non-active controls ( $$ \overline{g} $$ g ¯ ≈ 0.200, p < .001). Interestingly, music training is ineffective regardless of the type of outcome measure (e.g., verbal, non-verbal, speed-related, etc.), participants’ age, and duration of training. Furthermore, we note that, beyond meta-analysis of experimental studies, a considerable amount of cross-sectional evidence indicates that engagement in music has no impact on people’s non-music cognitive skills or academic achievement. We conclude that researchers’ optimism about the benefits of music training is empirically unjustified and stems from misinterpretation of the empirical data and, possibly, confirmation bias.”
- 4How musical training affects cognitive development: rhythm, reward and other modulating variablesFrontiers in Neuroscience (Lombard & Trost)Published Jan 1, 2014Checked Sep 30, 2026
“Learning to play an instrument as a child may even predict academic performance and IQ in young adulthood. The degree of observed structural and functional adaptation in the brain correlates with intensity and duration of practice. Importantly, the effects on cognitive development depend on the timing of musical initiation due to sensitive periods during development, as well as on several other modulating variables. Notably, we point to motivation, reward and social context of musical education, which are important yet neglected factors affecting the long-term benefits of musical training. Further, we introduce the notion of rhythmic entrainment and suggest that it may represent a mechanism supporting learning and development of executive functions. It also hones temporal processing and orienting of attention in time that may underlie enhancements observed in reading and verbal memory. We conclude that musical training uniquely engenders near and far transfer effects, preparing a foundation for a range of skills, and thus fostering cognitive development.”
- 5Music education (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Sep 29, 2026Checked Sep 30, 2026
“Music education is a field of practice in which educators are trained for careers as elementary or secondary music teachers, school or music conservatory ensemble directors. Music education is also a research area in which scholars do original research on ways of teaching and learning music. Music education scholars publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals, and teach undergraduate and graduate education students at university education or music schools, who are training to become music teachers. Music education touches on all learning domains, including the domain (the development of skills), the cognitive domain (the acquisition of knowledge), and, in particular and the affective domain (the learner's willingness to receive, internalize, and share what is learned), including music appreciation and sensitivity. Many music education curriculums incorporate the usage of mathematical skills as well fluid usage and understanding of a secondary language or culture. The consistency of practicing these skills has been shown to benefit students in a multitude of other academic areas as well as improving performance on standardized tests such as the ACT and SAT.”
- 6Musical training is associated with cognitive outcomes and white matter microstructure in middle childhood.Developmental cognitive neuroscience (Lopez et al.)Published Sep 6, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“Using a combination of behavioral assessments and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in a sample of 76 preadolescents (38 with musical training and 38 without musical training) between 7 and 9 years old, cognitive abilities were tested using the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ III) and the Operation Span Task (OSPAN), while academic achievement was assessed using the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (KTEA II). Behavioral results revealed that participants with musical training had higher cognitive scores (F(5, 70) = 2.89, p = .02) and greater academic achievement (F(5, 70) = 4.09, p = .003) compared to those without musical training. DTI results revealed that musical training was associated with higher mode (F(1, 48) = 5.82, p = 0.02) in the right PCG to STGp tract of the arcuate fasciculus (AF), although the relationship was marginally significant following Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Together, these results provide both behavioral and neural evidence for the relationship between musical training and cognition in a sample of preadolescents.”
- 7Effects of music training in executive function performance in children: A systematic review.Frontiers in psychology (Rodriguez-Gomez & Talero-Gutiérrez)Published Aug 8, 2022Checked Oct 4, 2026
“Music training has traditionally been a fundamental component of children's education across several cultures. Moreover, music training has been hypothesized to enhance the development of executive functions and improve executive performance in children. In this systematic review, we analyze the available evidence of the effects of music training on executive function performance, evaluated using validated neuropsychologic batteries and classic tasks. To achieve this objective, we performed a systematic search in three databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus) and selected case-control or intervention studies conducted on children with neurotypical development. We analyzed 29 studies that met the inclusion criteria and observed significant heterogeneity among the music interventions and methods for assessing executive functions. The review of the available literature suggests a beneficial effect of music training in core executive function performance, primarily in inhibitory control, and to a lesser extent, in working memory and cognitive flexibility.”
- 8Music participation, global cortical morphometry, and later language outcomes in the ABCD study.Frontiers in psychology (Wang et al.)Published Aug 5, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“Global cortical surface area and volume, but not cortical thickness or sulcal depth, statistically accounted for 4.1%-8.1% of these associations. Each 1-standard-deviation increase in practice intensity was associated with slightly higher crystallized cognition and picture vocabulary scores, with adjusted standardized differences ranging from 0.04 to 0.06 standard deviation units, but was not associated with oral reading recognition. For the two significant outcomes, global cortical surface area and volume statistically accounted for 4.6%-6.5% of the observed associations. In the twin subsample, sustained music participation remained positively associated with all three language outcomes, whereas practice intensity was not significantly associated with any language outcome.DiscussionThese findings provide longitudinal, population-based evidence that real-world music participation may be a relevant environmental correlate of language development in late childhood and that global cortical morphometry may statistically account for a small but measurable proportion of these associations.”
- 9The impact of musical training on reading ability in children: the mediating role of working memory.Frontiers in psychology (Yang et al.)Published Jul 7, 2026Checked Oct 4, 2026
“Study 2 implemented a 12-week music-based rhythmic movement training program consisting of 20 sessions among lower-grade children without prior musical training.ResultsIn Study 1, children with musical training performed better than children without musical training in musical ability, working memory, and some reading tasks. Working memory partially mediated the relationship between musical ability and antonym judgment and fully mediated the relationship between musical ability and sentence proposition judgment. In Study 2, children in the music intervention group showed improvements in musical ability, working memory accuracy, antonym judgment, and sentence proposition judgment.DiscussionThese findings provide evidence from both an associational pathway and an intervention context, suggesting that working memory may represent a possible cognitive pathway linking musical training to the development of some reading-related abilities. Music-based rhythmic movement training may provide a feasible approach for supporting reading-related development among children from multilingual backgrounds in frontier regions.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Sep 30, 2026.
- Version 2Sep 30, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
“How to read the disagreement” has no evidence or firsthand experience yet
It's a synthesis for now. Evidence or experience would show whether it holds.
Open questions
Does starting music earlier, during proposed sensitive periods, produce larger or more durable cognitive effects than starting later?
No answers yet
How much of any observed benefit is explained by rhythmic entrainment and attention training versus by motivation, reward, adult attention and social context?
No answers yet
Is there a practice-intensity or duration threshold below which no general cognitive benefit appears, and does the dose-response hold under randomised designs?
No answers yet
Can near-transfer gains in auditory discrimination and fine motor skills be shown to feed into reading, verbal memory or academic achievement in controlled trials?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.