Is vaping safer than smoking, and how many non-smokers vape?
Vaping is less harmful than smoking but still risky, and most vaping is concentrated among people who already smoked.
Covers: What research and public-health bodies say about the relative harms of vaping versus smoking, and estimates of vaping among people who have never smoked, including youth and young adults. Does not cover quitting strategies, product recommendations or local laws.
Also answers: Is vaping less harmful than smoking? · How many non-smokers use vapes? · Are e-cigarettes safer than cigarettes? · What percentage of people who vape never smoked?
- One page for this question6 other ways of asking lead here
- 6 independent sourcesEvery claim links to what supports it
- Joins the mapLinked as related pages appear
- Clean discussionScreened before anything appears
The short answer
Interpretation AI-prepared starting mapPublic-health and reference sources agree that vaping is less harmful than smoking but still carries health risks. The BBC reports that one million people in the UK who have never smoked are now vaping, and that for a second year running more over-16s vape than smoke. Research on who vapes shows use is heavily concentrated among people with a smoking history: among Scottish adults aged 60 and over, e-cigarette use was strongly patterned by smoking history (adjusted OR 18.78 for current smokers versus never-smokers). Among 97 young adults who vaped frequently, about half used nicotine only and half also used cannabis, and those using nicotine only were more likely to see vaping as less harmful than smoking (65.9% vs 39.6%).1234
- Evidence 17
- Interpretation 4
Did this answer your question?
Be the first to voteIn brief
Public-health and reference sources describe vaping as less harmful than smoking but still risky, particularly for people with asthma.4
Evidence-backedOne million people in the UK who have never smoked now vape, and more over-16s vape than smoke for a second year running.1
Evidence-backedIn older adults, vaping is strongly concentrated among current and former smokers rather than never-smokers.2
Evidence-backedAn apparent lower rate of hypertension among exclusive vapers weakened and lost significance after matching, so it should not be read as a protective effect.5
Evidence-backedFrequent young-adult vapers who used nicotine only were more likely than dual users to see vaping as less harmful than smoking, and most wanted to quit but few had received treatment.3
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
- Nicotine only49.5%
- Nicotine and cannabis50.5%
- Nicotine only65.9%
- Nicotine and cannabis39.6%
The evidence behind it
6 sources- Other studies and data4
- Background2
Published in 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| One million UK people who have never smoked are now vaping | Background | 2026 |
| Motives and Risk Perceptions Among Young Adults Engaged in Frequent Vaping and Dual Cannabis Use: Implications for Prevention and Intervention. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Prevalence and correlates of e-cigarette use among older adults aged 60 years and over. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and hypertension: a population-based cross-sectional study. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| E-cigarettes and periodontal health: current evidence and research gaps. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Electronic cigarette (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
The community around it
No one has added to this page yet. Firsthand experience, a newer study or a different reading of the numbers would show up here, credited to you.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you smoke and are considering switching to vaping
the sources describe vaping as less harmful than smoking and nicotine e-cigarettes as more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for quitting, though they have not been tested as rigorously as NRT products.4
Evidence-backedIf you have never smoked and are thinking about starting to vape
the sources describe vaping as still carrying health risks, and note that most vaping is concentrated among people with a smoking history, so the harm-reduction argument for switching does not apply to you.42
InterpretationIf you have asthma
the reference material flags vaping as particularly risky for people with asthma.4
Evidence-backedIf you are over 60 and vape or are considering it
use in this age group is low but non-trivial and strongly tied to smoking history, and the study authors call for age-sensitive clinical counselling and balanced risk communication.2
Evidence-backedIf you are a young adult who vapes frequently and wants to stop
in one small study two thirds of frequent young-adult vapers were interested in quitting but fewer than 5% had received treatment, suggesting unmet demand for support.3
Evidence-backedIf you are weighing claims that vaping protects against conditions like hypertension
the apparent lower odds among exclusive vapers did not survive propensity score matching, so it may reflect healthy-switcher bias rather than a real protective effect.5
Evidence-backedIf you care about oral health
cross-sectional studies generally found poorer periodontal measures among e-cigarette users than never-smokers, but longitudinal evidence is limited and results for attachment loss and bone loss are inconsistent.6
Evidence-backedThe full story · 2 chapters
01
Is vaping safer than smoking?
AI summary:Vaping is described as less harmful than smoking but still risky, and an apparent lower hypertension rate among vapers faded after stronger analysis.
Evidence-backed: Reference and public-health material states plainly that vaping is less harmful than smoking but still has health risks, particularly for people with asthma. E-cigarettes deliver nicotine in an aerosol of propylene glycol or glycerin rather than tobacco smoke, and limited evidence indicates they are less addictive than smoking, with slower nicotine absorption. Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes are described as more effective than nicotine replacement therapy for quitting smoking, though they have not been tested as rigorously as NRT products.4
Evidence-backed: The picture is less clean when specific health outcomes are measured. In a population-based cross-sectional study, overall hypertension prevalence was 26.5%, ranging from 19.0% among current exclusive e-cigarette users to 33.5% among former smokers. Compared with never users, exclusive e-cigarette use was associated with lower odds of hypertension (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93), while former smokers had higher odds (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). No significant associations appeared for current cigarette smoking only (OR 0.94) or dual use (OR 0.95). Crucially, the inverse association for exclusive vaping was confined to former smokers who had switched, and after propensity score matching it was attenuated and no longer statistically significant, pointing to healthy-switcher bias and residual confounding rather than a protective effect.5
Evidence-backed: For periodontal health, cross-sectional studies generally reported poorer conditions among e-cigarette users than never-smokers, including higher plaque index and probing depth, though results for clinical attachment loss and alveolar bone loss were inconsistent. Comparisons between e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers often showed more favourable clinical parameters among vapers. Longitudinal evidence remains limited: the only prospective cohort study reported higher clinical attachment loss among e-cigarette users than never-smokers and an increase over time exclusively in e-cigarette users. Studies of response to periodontal therapy were inconsistent.6
02
How many people who have never smoked vape?
AI summary:One million UK never-smokers now vape, yet use remains heavily concentrated among people with a smoking history, especially older adults.
Evidence-backed: The BBC reports that one million people in the UK who have never smoked are now vaping, based on the latest statistics, which also show that for the second year in a row more over-16s vape than smoke.1
Evidence-backed: Other studies suggest vaping remains concentrated among people with a smoking history. Among Scottish adults aged 60 and over, prevalence was broadly stable across survey years, ranging from 2.16% (95% CI 1.43-3.25) in 2021 to 5.55% (95% CI 4.43-6.93) in 2023, and use was overwhelmingly concentrated among those with a smoking history: current smokers had adjusted odds of 18.78 (95% CI 11.79-29.92) compared with never-smokers. The authors note a steep age gradient and deprivation patterning.2
Evidence-backed: Among young adults, a study of 97 people aged 15-25 recruited via social media who vaped in the past month found vaping was frequent and consistent, reported on average 25 of the past 30 days. Half used nicotine only (n=48, 49.5%) and half reported dual nicotine and cannabis use (n=49, 50.5%). Those vaping nicotine only were more likely to perceive vaping as less harmful than smoking (65.9% vs 39.6%; p=.01) and less likely to report concerns about negative health consequences (mean 6.6 vs 7.7; p=.01). Two thirds were interested in quitting, but fewer than 5% had received treatment.3
Interpretation: The headline UK figure and the age-specific studies point in different directions on how much never-smoking vaping there is: a large absolute number of never-smoking vapers coexists with prevalence that is still heavily skewed toward people with smoking histories, especially in older age groups.12
Your turn
Have your say
See where others stand. Join free to add your perspective. One answer per account.
How do you feel about this?
No votes yetQuick questions from connected pages
Before you go
What to remember
Try to recall each hidden figure before you reveal it. Remembering, not rereading, is what makes it stick.
One million people in the UK who have never smoked now vape, and more over-s vape than smoke for a second year running.
Public-health and reference sources describe vaping as less harmful than smoking but still risky, particularly for people with asthma.
In older adults, vaping is strongly concentrated among current and former smokers rather than never-smokers.
Your reading
0 of 2 chaptersThis answer keeps changing
When new evidence or a better source comes in, this page is updated (it's on version 2, last changed 2 hours ago). Follow it to be told when that happens.
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1One million UK people who have never smoked are now vapingBBC NewsPublished Oct 6, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Latest statistics also show, for the second year in a row, more over-16s vape than smoke.”
- 2Prevalence and correlates of e-cigarette use among older adults aged 60 years and over.European geriatric medicine (Adebisi et al.)Published Jun 29, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Prevalence remained broadly stable across survey years, ranging from 2.16% (95% CI: 1.43-3.25) in 2021 to 5.55% (95% CI: 4.43-6.93) in 2023. E-cigarette use was overwhelmingly concentrated among those with a smoking history: current smokers (adjusted OR 18.78, 95% CI: 11.79-29.92, p ConclusionsE-cigarette use among Scottish older adults was low but non-trivial and was strongly patterned by smoking history. The concentration of use among current and former smokers suggests that e-cigarette use in this age group occurs mainly among people with prior exposure to combustible tobacco, although the cross-sectional design cannot determine whether use reflects cessation, substitution, experimentation, or persistent dual use. The steep age gradient, deprivation patterning, and association with poorer self-rated health highlight the need for age-sensitive clinical counselling and balanced risk communication in older adults.”
- 3Motives and Risk Perceptions Among Young Adults Engaged in Frequent Vaping and Dual Cannabis Use: Implications for Prevention and Intervention.Journal of psychoactive drugs (Cavazos-Rehg et al.)Published Sep 10, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“In this study, social media was used to recruit 97 young adults aged 15-25 who reported vaping in the past month. Participants completed an online survey assessing vaping behaviors, perceived risks of vaping, and interest in treatment. Descriptive statistics and differences between participants vaping nicotine only and those vaping nicotine and cannabis (dual use) are reported. Vaping was found to be frequent and consistent among all participants, reported on average 25 of the past 30 days. Half of participants reported vaping nicotine only (n = 48, 49.5%) and half reported dual use (n = 49, 50.5%). Participants vaping nicotine only were more likely to perceive vaping as less harmful than smoking (65.9% vs 39.6%; p = .01) and were less likely to report concerns about the negative health consequences of nicotine vaping (Mean (SD): 6.6(2.5) vs 7.7(1.3); p = .01). Two thirds of participants reported interest in quitting, however less than 5% reported receiving treatment. These findings underscore the diverse motives and risk perceptions that shape frequent and dual vaping behaviors and can inform tailored treatment efforts.”
- 4Electronic cigarette (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 5, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“An electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) or vape is a device that simulates tobacco smoking. It consists of an atomizer, a power source such as a battery, and a container such as a cartridge or tank. Instead of smoke, the user inhales vapor, often called "vaping". The atomizer is a heating element that vaporizes a liquid solution called e-liquid that cools into an aerosol of tiny droplets, vapor and air. The vapor mainly comprises propylene glycol or glycerin, usually with nicotine and flavoring. Its exact composition varies, and depends on matters such as user behavior. E-cigarettes are activated by taking a puff or pressing a button. Some look like traditional cigarettes, and most kinds are reusable. Vaping is less harmful than smoking, but still has health risks, particularly for those with asthma. Limited evidence indicates that e-cigarettes are less addictive than smoking, with slower nicotine absorption rates. E-cigarettes containing nicotine are more effective than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smoking cessation, but have not been tested as rigorously as nicotine replacement therapy products.”
- 5Cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and hypertension: a population-based cross-sectional study.Journal of human hypertension (Adebisi et al.)Published Jun 4, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary analyses disaggregated current e-cigarette use only by smoking history, and propensity score matching was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Overall hypertension prevalence was 26.5%, ranging from 19.0% among current exclusive e-cigarette users to 33.5% among former smokers. Compared with never users, current e-cigarette use only was associated with lower odds of hypertension (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.93), whereas former smokers had higher odds (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.20). No significant associations were observed for current cigarette smoking only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.06) or current dual use (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.20). The inverse association for exclusive e-cigarette use was confined to former smokers who had switched to vaping (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94). In propensity score-matched analyses, the inverse association for current exclusive e-cigarette use was attenuated and no longer statistically significant, suggesting that this finding may partly reflect healthy switcher bias and residual confounding rather than a protective effect.”
- 6E-cigarettes and periodontal health: current evidence and research gaps.Brazilian oral research (Pannuti et al.)Published Aug 21, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Cross-sectional studies generally reported poorer periodontal conditions among EC users compared with never-smokers, including higher plaque index and periodontal probing depth, although results for CAL and alveolar bone loss were inconsistent. Comparisons between EC users and cigarette smokers often showed more favorable clinical parameters among EC users. Longitudinal evidence continued to be limited. The only prospective cohort study reported higher CAL among EC users than never-smokers and observed an increase in CAL over time exclusively in EC users. Interventional studies assessing response to periodontal therapy have yielded inconsistent results, with some suggesting a poorer treatment response among EC users and others finding no significant differences. Overall, there were Well-designed longitudinal studies with clearly defined exposure groups, standardized periodontal outcomes, and longer follow-up are needed to clarify whether EC use independently contributes to periodontal deterioration.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 10, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 10, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
Open questions
Is the number of never-smoking vapers rising, stable or falling, and how does it split by age group and by whether the products contain nicotine?
No answers yet
What do long-term studies show about diseases such as periodontal disease, cardiovascular outcomes and respiratory conditions in people who vape but have never smoked?
No answers yet
How many young people who have never smoked go on to vape regularly, and how many of those later take up smoking?
No answers yet
Does believing vaping is much less harmful than smoking change how often people vape or how likely they are to quit?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.