How do non-compete clauses affect workers and job mobility?
Non-compete clauses stop workers from moving to competing employers, weaken their bargaining power, and often cover low-wage workers who hold no trade secrets.
Covers: What research and official data show about how non-compete agreements affect wages, job switching, entrepreneurship, and worker bargaining power, including differences by occupation, pay level, and state law. It does not give legal advice or cover related but distinct agreements such as non-solicitation or nondisclosure clauses in detail.
Also answers: What are the effects of non-compete agreements on employees? · Do non-competes hurt workers' job mobility? · How do non-compete clauses affect wages and job switching? · Are non-compete agreements bad for workers?
- One page for this question6 other ways of asking lead here
- 5 independent sourcesEvery claim links to what supports it
- Joins the mapLinked as related pages appear
- Clean discussionScreened before anything appears
Before you read, make a guess
Fill in the blank: ?% of surveyed behavior analysts whose contract contained a non-compete clause
Drag the slider to fill in the blank
The short answer
Evidence-backed AI-prepared starting mapNon-compete clauses (NCCs) are contract terms under which a worker agrees not to enter or start a similar profession or trade in competition with an employer. In the labor market they restrict movement between employers and weaken workers' bargaining leverage, and while modern use is often justified by protecting trade secrets or customer lists, many clauses also cover low-wage workers who hold no such secrets. How far they are allowed and enforced varies by jurisdiction.1
- Evidence 20
Did this answer your question?
Be the first to voteIn brief
Non-compete clauses restrict where workers can go next and weaken their bargaining leverage, and they often cover low-wage workers who hold no trade secrets.1
Evidence-backedReported effects are mixed: some workers cite higher pay and shorter commutes, while others report litigation, leaving the field, or turning away clients.3
Evidence-backedFor physicians, the net effects on providers and patients cannot be stated with confidence from the existing law and economics literature.4
Evidence-backedThe rules are politically contested: the UK prime minister has said restrictions have "gone too far" and promised to curb them.5
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
33.1%
33 in every 100
- currently working under one37%
- worked under one in the past33%
- never had one30%
610 behavior analysts
The evidence behind it
5 sources- Other studies and data3
- Background2
When it was published
Newest from 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Burnham promises to curb non-compete rules in job contracts | Background | 2026 |
| Reported Effects of Noncompete Clauses on Practitioners in Applied Behavior Analysis. | Other studies and data | 2022 |
| Noncompete Clauses in Applied Behavior Analysis: A Prevalence and Practice Impact Survey. | Other studies and data | 2020 |
| A Competition Perspective on Physician Non-compete Agreements. | Other studies and data | 2024 |
| Non-compete clause (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
The community around it
No one has added to this page yet. Firsthand experience, a newer study or a different reading of the numbers would show up here, credited to you.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you work in applied behavior analysis and are weighing a contract with a non-compete clause
practitioners in this field report both benefits (higher pay, shorter commutes) and serious costs (litigation, having to stop working in the field, turning away clients), so the clause is worth reading closely before signing.3
Evidence-backedIf you are a physician considering a role covered by a non-compete
the agreements are treated differently under state law and the net effects on physicians and patients are not established with confidence, so the specific market and state matter more than any general rule.4
Evidence-backedIf you are an employer considering using non-compete clauses
employers in the surveyed field cite protecting trade secrets, avoiding losing clients, and reducing turnover as reasons, but the same clauses are also reported to push workers out of the field and away from clients.3
Evidence-backedIf you are a low-wage worker asked to sign a non-compete
many clauses apply to workers who hold no transferable trade secrets, and enforcement varies by jurisdiction, so the practical risk depends on where you work.1
Evidence-backedIf you are following policy debate on non-competes
the UK prime minister has said the restrictions have "gone too far" and promised to curb them, which is a stated intention rather than an evaluated change.5
Evidence-backedThe full story · 4 chapters
01
What non-compete clauses are and how they work
AI summary:Non-compete clauses are contract terms barring workers from competing with an employer, justified by trade secrets but often applied to low-wage workers.
Evidence-backed: A non-compete clause is a contract term under which one party, usually an employee, agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party, usually the employer. They are also called restrictive covenants or covenants not to compete. The practice is rooted in the medieval apprenticeship system, where an apprentice could be bound not to compete with the master after training.1
Evidence-backed: Modern justifications usually rest on preventing high-skilled workers from carrying trade secrets or customer lists to a competing firm. But many clauses apply to low-wage workers or people who hold no transferable trade secrets, and the extent to which they are legally allowed and enforced varies across jurisdictions.1
Evidence-backed: In the labor market, these agreements prevent workers from moving freely across employers and weaken workers' bargaining leverage.1
02
How common they are in the surveyed professions
AI summary:Surveys of behavior analysts found roughly a third working under a non-compete clause, with many others having done so in the past.
Evidence-backed: In a survey of 610 practicing behavior analysts, 33.1% said their contract contained a non-compete clause, and opinions on the clauses' potential impact were largely unfavorable.2
Evidence-backed: A later survey of practitioners in applied behavior analysis found 37% currently working under a non-compete clause, 33% who had worked under one in the past, and 30% who never had.3
03
Reported effects on workers
AI summary:Reported effects are mixed, from higher pay and shorter commutes to litigation, leaving the field, or turning away clients.
Evidence-backed: Reported effects on practitioners' personal and work lives were mixed. Some respondents described benefits of working under a clause, such as increased pay and a reduced commute. Others reported serious consequences: being involved in litigation, having to partially or completely stop working in the field, having to turn away clients, or contemplating leaving the field altogether.3
Evidence-backed: Employers who use the clauses gave reasons including protecting trade secrets, avoiding losing clients, and reducing employee turnover.3
Evidence-backed: For physicians, the competitive implications may be significant for both providers and patients, but the agreements are treated variously under state law, and a review of the relevant law and economic literature could not identify with confidence the net effects on physicians or on health care delivery with any generality. The author argues that the antitrust "rule of reason" offers a useful framework for evaluating such agreements in specific health care markets.4
04
Policy attention
AI summary:In the UK, the prime minister said restrictions have gone too far and promised to curb non-compete rules, though no law has changed yet.
Evidence-backed: In the United Kingdom, the prime minister said restrictions on what workers can do after leaving roles have "gone too far" and promised to curb non-compete rules in job contracts. This is a stated political intention rather than an evaluated change in law.5
Your turn
Have your say
See where others stand. Join free to add your perspective. One answer per account.
How do you feel about this?
No votes yetQuick questions from connected pages
Before you go
What to remember
The few things worth keeping from this page.
Non-compete clauses restrict where workers can go next and weaken their bargaining leverage, and they often cover low-wage workers who hold no trade secrets.
In applied behavior analysis, roughly a third of surveyed practitioners reported working under a non-compete clause.
Reported effects are mixed: some workers cite higher pay and shorter commutes, while others report litigation, leaving the field, or turning away clients.
Your reading
0 of 4 chaptersThis answer keeps changing
When new evidence or a better source comes in, this page is updated (it's on version 2, last changed 2 hours ago). Follow it to be told when that happens.
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1Non-compete clause (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 6, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“In contract law, a non-compete clause (often NCC), restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party (usually an employee) agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer). In the labor market, these agreements prevent workers from freely moving across employers, and weaken the bargaining leverage of workers. Non-compete agreements are rooted in the medieval system of apprenticeship whereby an older master craftsman took on a younger apprentice, trained the apprentice, and in some cases entered into an agreement whereby the apprentice could not compete with the master after the apprenticeship. Modern uses of non-compete agreements are generally premised on preventing high-skilled workers from transferring trade secrets or a customer list from one firm to a competing firm, thus giving the competing firm a competitive advantage. However, many non-compete clauses apply to low-wage workers or individuals who do not possess transferable trade secrets. The extent to which non-compete clauses are legally allowed and enforced varies under different jurisdictions.”
- 2Noncompete Clauses in Applied Behavior Analysis: A Prevalence and Practice Impact Survey.Behavior analysis in practice (Brown et al.)Published Sep 3, 2020Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Behavior analysts seeking out new employment may have to weigh benefits such as pay, health care, and conditions of employment during negotiations. One condition of employment used in employment contracts is noncompete clauses (NCCs). NCCs are agreements between employers and employees that restrict the employee's ability to work in a specific field after employment ends. Although they can provide businesses with security, NCCs have the potential to impact how, when, and whom practitioners can serve after employment ends. Although NCCs and their effects have been studied in other fields, to our knowledge no analysis has occurred in the field of ABA. We surveyed 610 practicing behavior analysts to determine the prevalence of NCCs in the field of ABA and how respondents viewed the impact of NCCs on the field; one third (33.1%) of respondents indicated that their contract contained an NCC, and opinions on their potential impact were largely unfavorable. Results are discussed with regard to how NCCs can impact the growth of ABA, possible behavioral functions, possible alternatives to their use, and directions for future research.”
- 3Reported Effects of Noncompete Clauses on Practitioners in Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice (Brown & Brodhead)Published May 31, 2022Checked Oct 10, 2026
“The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reported impact of noncompete clauses (NCCs) on practitioners in the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA). Thirty-seven percent of respondents indicated they currently worked under a NCC, 33% reported working under one in the past, and 30% reported never working under one. Responses on the effects of NCCs on practitioners' personal and work lives were mixed. Some respondents reported benefits associated with working under an NCC such as increased pay and reduced commute. However, a concerning number of respondents reported being involved in litigation, having to partially or completely stop working in the field of ABA, having to turn away clients due to NCCs, or contemplating leaving the field altogether. Further, many owners reported using NCCs to protect trade secrets, to avoid losing clients, and reduce employee turnover. The impact of NCCs in ABA, the rights of employees and owners, and suggestions for potential solutions in the field are discussed.”
- 4A Competition Perspective on Physician Non-compete Agreements.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing (Gilman)Published Jan 1, 2024Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Physician non-compete agreements may have significant competitive implications, and effects on both providers and patients, but they are treated variously under the law on a state-by-state basis. Reviewing the relevant law and the economic literature cannot identify with confidence the net effects of such agreements on either physicians or health care delivery with any generality. In addition to identifying future research projects to inform policy, it is argued that the antitrust "rule of reason" provides a useful and established framework with which to evaluate such agreements in specific health care markets and, potentially, to address those agreements most likely to do significant damage to health care competition and consumers.”
- 5Burnham promises to curb non-compete rules in job contractsBBC NewsPublished Oct 9, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“The prime minister says restrictions on what workers can do after leaving roles have "gone too far".”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 10, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 10, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
“What non-compete clauses are and how they work” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
“Policy attention” rests on one independent source
A second, independent source that confirms or challenges it would make this part more reliable.
Open questions
What do measured wage and job-switching outcomes look like outside the surveyed professions, and how do they differ by occupation and pay level?
No answers yet
How much do outcomes depend on whether a clause is actually enforced or litigated, rather than merely signed?
No answers yet
How do outcomes differ between states that enforce non-competes and those that restrict them?
No answers yet
What happens to entrepreneurship and new firm formation where non-competes are widely used or restricted?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.