What is the most extreme rogue wave ever recorded?
The most extreme rogue wave depends on whether you mean the tallest wave or the one biggest relative to the sea around it.
Covers: The largest and most extreme rogue waves documented in the scientific record, including the 2020 Ucluelet wave off Vancouver Island and the 1995 Draupner wave, and explains how rogue waves are defined and measured. Does not cover fictional depictions of giant waves or general tsunami science.
Also answers: What is the biggest rogue wave ever recorded? · Most extreme rogue wave in history · Largest freak wave ever measured · How big was the largest rogue wave?
- One page for this question6 other ways of asking lead here
- 6 independent sourcesEvery claim links to what supports it
- Joins the mapLinked as related pages appear
- Clean discussionScreened before anything appears
The short answer
Interpretation AI-prepared starting mapThe most extreme rogue wave in the scientific record is usually taken to be the 17.6 m wave measured in coastal waters off Ucluelet, British Columbia, in 2020, which had a height about 2.9 times the significant wave height of the surrounding sea state — described as likely the largest normalized rogue height ever recorded. The 1995 Draupner wave was taller in absolute terms at 25.6 m, but it occurred in a much larger sea state (significant wave height about 12 m), so its ratio to the surrounding waves was smaller. "Most extreme" therefore depends on whether you mean absolute height or height relative to the sea state.12
- Evidence 16
- Interpretation 5
Did this answer your question?
Be the first to voteIn brief
A rogue wave is defined as one more than twice the significant wave height of the surrounding sea state, which makes "most extreme" depend on whether you measure absolute height or the ratio to the sea.3
Evidence-backedThe 2020 Ucluelet wave, at 17.6 m with a ratio of about 2.9 times the significant wave height, is reported as likely the largest normalized rogue height ever recorded.1
Evidence-backedThe 1995 Draupner wave was 25.6 m high in a sea state with a significant wave height of 12 m, making it one of the first confirmed field measurements of a freak wave and the taller of the two in absolute terms.2
Evidence-backedBetween 2005 and 2021, 429 damaging freak wave events were catalogued from descriptions, showing they are a recurring hazard to ships, offshore structures and coastlines.5
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
- Ucluelet 202017.6 m
- Draupner 199525.6 m
429 events
300 rogue waves
The evidence behind it
6 sources- Other studies and data4
- Background2
When it was published
Newest from 2023
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Generation mechanism and prediction of an observed extreme rogue wave | Other studies and data | 2022 |
| Laboratory recreation of the Draupner wave and the role of breaking in crossing seas | Other studies and data | 2018 |
| Rogue wave (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
| List of rogue waves incidents (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
| Freak wave events in 2005–2021: statistics and analysis of favourable wave and wind conditions | Other studies and data | 2023 |
| Observations of the shape and group dynamics of rogue waves | Other studies and data | 2017 |
The community around it
No one has added to this page yet. Firsthand experience, a newer study or a different reading of the numbers would show up here, credited to you.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you want to know which single wave is the most extreme
compare on the measure you care about: the Draupner wave is the tallest in absolute height at 25.6 m, while the Ucluelet wave is the most extreme relative to its surrounding sea at about 2.9 times the significant wave height.21
InterpretationIf you are assessing risk to a vessel or offshore structure
note that rogue waves are defined relative to the local sea state, so a moderate sea can still produce a dangerous wave, and a spectral-forecast parameter has been shown to give a practical risk prediction.13
Evidence-backedIf you are near the coast or on a beach in rough conditions
be aware that rogue waves can pose a danger to beachgoers, and a rogue wave at the shore is sometimes called a sneaker wave.13
Evidence-backedIf you are trying to understand why a particular rogue wave formed
consider that random superposition of steep nonlinear waves explains many field observations, while the Draupner wave was reproduced in the laboratory only with two wave systems crossing at a large angle.42
Evidence-backedIf you are looking for how common damaging rogue waves are
a catalogue of 429 events from 2005 to 2021, all involving damage or human loss, gives a sense of their frequency and typical background conditions.5
Evidence-backedThe full story · 4 chapters
01
What counts as a rogue wave
AI summary:A rogue wave is more than twice the significant wave height, so extremeness can mean absolute height or the ratio to the sea.
Evidence-backed: In oceanography, a rogue wave is defined precisely as a wave whose height is more than twice the significant wave height (Hs), where Hs is the mean of the largest third of waves in a wave record. Rogue waves are also called freak, monster or killer waves, and a rogue wave at the shore is sometimes called a sneaker wave. They are distinct from tsunamis, which are long-wavelength waves caused by displacement of water such as from earthquakes and are often almost unnoticeable in deep water.3
Interpretation: Because the definition is a ratio, a wave's "extremeness" can be measured two ways: its absolute height in metres, or how many times larger it is than the surrounding sea state. A 25 m wave in a 12 m sea state and a 17.6 m wave in a roughly 6 m sea state are both rogue waves, but they are extreme in different senses.21
02
The record holders: Ucluelet 2020 and Draupner 1995
AI summary:Ucluelet 2020 was the most extreme relative to its sea; Draupner 1995 was taller in absolute terms.
Evidence-backed: The 2020 Ucluelet wave was 17.6 m high in coastal waters, with a height ratio to significant wave height of about 2.9 — reported as likely the largest normalized rogue heights ever recorded. Simulations of random superposition of Stokes waves in intermediate water depth agreed well with the observation, and modulational instability, a well-known cause of rogue waves in laboratory settings, did not contribute significantly to its generation. A parameter taken from a routine spectral wave forecast was shown to provide a practical risk prediction for rogue waves.1
Evidence-backed: The 1995 Draupner wave was 25.6 m high, observed in a sea state with a significant wave height of 12 m, and was one of the first confirmed field measurements of a freak wave. Laboratory experiments in a circular wave tank recreated the full scaled crest amplitude and profile of the Draupner wave, including bound set-up, but only for conditions where two wave systems crossed at a large angle. The onset and type of wave breaking differed significantly between crossing and non-crossing waves, and breaking became less crest-amplitude limiting at sufficiently large crossing angles, involving near-vertical jets.2
03
How rogue waves form
AI summary:Rogue waves have no single cause; random superposition explains many events, while Draupner needed crossing wave systems.
Evidence-backed: Rogue waves do not appear to have a single distinct cause. They occur where physical factors such as high winds and strong currents cause waves to merge into a single large wave. Research published in 2023 suggests that sea state crest-trough correlation leading to linear superposition may be a dominant factor in predicting the frequency of rogue waves.3
Evidence-backed: Field observations from two locations in the northeast Pacific, covering 300 individual rogue waves with heights greater than 2.2 times the significant wave height found among more than 2 million wave groups, showed that rogue waves are most commonly located in the centre of a wave group rather than at the front, contrary to some nonlinear modelling results. Steep waves do tend to occur at the front of a group, but these are not the largest waves of the group and do not meet the rogue wave criterion. The authors concluded that random superposition of nonlinear waves is sufficient to explain the observations of individual rogue waves.4
Interpretation: The Ucluelet analysis points the same way: random superposition of steep waves, not modulational instability, explained that event, and the authors argue that probabilistic prediction of oceanic rogue waves based on random superposition should replace predictions based on modulational instability. The Draupner laboratory work, by contrast, points to crossing sea states and breaking behaviour as central to that particular wave. These are not necessarily contradictory — different events may be dominated by different mechanisms — but the balance between mechanisms remains an open question.124
04
How often they occur and where
AI summary:Between 2005 and 2021, 429 damaging freak wave events were catalogued, showing a recurring hazard at sea and on coasts.
Evidence-backed: A unified collection of freak wave events from chronicles and catalogues between 2005 and 2021 accounts for 429 events, all of which resulted in ship or coastal/offshore structure damage and/or human losses. These are descriptions found in mass media and scientific articles rather than in-situ measurements. The analysis combined event characteristics such as location, water depth and damage with wave parameters from the ERA5 climate reanalysis to determine the most probable background conditions at the time of each event, including wind speed, gusts, significant wave height, maximum wave height, peak wave period, skewness and kurtosis.5
Your turn
Have your say
See where others stand. Join free to add your perspective. One answer per account.
How do you feel about this?
No votes yetQuick questions from connected pages
Before you go
What to remember
Try to recall each hidden figure before you reveal it. Remembering, not rereading, is what makes it stick.
The 2020 Ucluelet wave, at m with a ratio of about 2.9 times the significant wave height, is reported as likely the largest normalized rogue height ever recorded.
The 1995 Draupner wave was m high in a sea state with a significant wave height of 12 m, making it one of the first confirmed field measurements of a freak wave and the taller of the two in absolute terms.
Between 2005 and 2021, damaging freak wave events were catalogued from descriptions, showing they are a recurring hazard to ships, offshore structures and coastlines.
Your reading
0 of 4 chaptersThis answer keeps changing
When new evidence or a better source comes in, this page is updated (it's on version 2, last changed 1 hour ago). Follow it to be told when that happens.
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1Generation mechanism and prediction of an observed extreme rogue waveScientific Reports (Gemmrich & Cicon)Published Feb 2, 2022Checked Oct 12, 2026
“The physics of rogue wave generation and the potential of predicting the rogue wave risk are open questions. Only a few rogue waves in high sea states have been observed directly, but they can pose a danger to marine operations, onshore and offshore structures, and beachgoers. Here we report on a 17.6m high rogue wave in coastal waters with [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] which are likely the largest normalized heights ever recorded. Simulations of random superposition of Stokes waves in intermediate water depth show good agreement with the observation. Non-linear wave modulational instability, a well known cause for rogue waves in laboratory settings, did not contribute significantly to the rogue wave generation. A parameter obtained from a routine spectral wave forecast provides a practical risk prediction for rogue waves. These results confirm that probabilistic prediction of oceanic rogue waves based on random superposition of steep waves are possible and should replace predictions based on modulational instability.”
- 2Laboratory recreation of the Draupner wave and the role of breaking in crossing seasJournal of Fluid Mechanics (McAllister et al.)Published Dec 11, 2018Checked Oct 12, 2026
“The 25.6 m high Draupner wave, observed in a sea state with a significant wave height of 12 m, was one of the first confirmed field measurements of a freak wave. The physical mechanisms that give rise to freak waves such as the Draupner wave are still contentious. Through physical experiments carried out in a circular wave tank, we attempt to recreate the freak wave measured at the Draupner platform and gain an understanding of the directional conditions capable of supporting such a large and steep wave. Herein, we recreate the full scaled crest amplitude and profile of the Draupner wave, including bound set-up. We find that the onset and type of wave breaking play a significant role and differ significantly for crossing and non-crossing waves. Crucially, breaking becomes less crest-amplitude limiting for sufficiently large crossing angles and involves the formation of near-vertical jets. In our experiments, we were only able to reproduce the scaled crest and total wave height of the wave measured at the Draupner platform for conditions where two wave systems cross at a large angle.”
- 3Rogue wave (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 12, 2026Checked Oct 12, 2026
“Rogue waves (also known as freak waves, monster waves, or killer waves) are large and unpredictable surface waves that can be extremely dangerous to ships and isolated structures such as lighthouses. They are distinct from tsunamis, which are long-wavelength waves, often almost unnoticeable in deep waters and caused by the displacement of water due to other phenomena (such as earthquakes). A rogue wave at the shore is sometimes called a sneaker wave. In oceanography, rogue waves are more precisely defined as waves whose heights are more than twice the significant wave height (Hs or SWH), which is itself defined as the mean of the largest third of waves in a wave record. Rogue waves do not appear to have a single distinct cause but occur where physical factors such as high winds and strong currents cause waves to merge to create a single large wave. Research published in 2023 suggests sea state crest-trough correlation leading to linear superposition may be a dominant factor in predicting the frequency of rogue waves.”
- 4Observations of the shape and group dynamics of rogue wavesGeophysical Research Letters (Gemmrich & Thomson)Published Jan 31, 2017Checked Oct 12, 2026
“Surface elevation records from two locations in the northeast Pacific are used to examine rogue waves and the relationship to wave groups. Three hundred individual rogue waves with heights greater than 2.2 times the significant wave height are found in analyzing >2 × 10 6 wave groups. In contrast to recent nonlinear modeling results, we do not find that rogue waves occur at the front of wave groups. There is a tendency for steep waves to occur at the front of a group, but these are not the largest waves of the group and do not meet the rogue wave criterion. Rogue waves are most commonly located in the center of the group, but their height ratio to the neighboring crest is greater than in the average wave group. Assessing group dynamics in terms of spectral width suggests that random superposition of nonlinear waves is sufficient to explain the observations of individual rogue waves.”
- 5Freak wave events in 2005–2021: statistics and analysis of favourable wave and wind conditionsNatural hazards and earth system sciences (Диденкулова et al.)Published May 2, 2023Checked Oct 12, 2026
“Abstract. Freak or rogue waves are unexpectedly large waves in seas and oceans, which occur without specific reasons, and cause human loss, damage of ships, oil platforms, and coastal structures. Evidences of such waves are widely spread around the globe. The present paper is devoted to analysis of the unified collection of freak wave events from different chronicles and catalogues from 2005 to 2021. The considered rogue waves are not measured in situ data, but their descriptions, which have been found in the mass media sources and scientific articles. All of them resulted in ship or coastal/offshore structure damage and/or human losses. The collection accounts for 429 events. First, the analysis based on their characteristics taken from the descriptions of the events (including locations, water depth, damages) is carried out. Second, the analysis of wave parameters taken from the climate reanalysis ERA5 is performed. Thus, the most probable background wave parameters in time of freak event (including wind speed, gusts, significant wave height, maximum wave height, peak wave period, skewness, and kurtosis) for each freak wave event are determined.”
- 6List of rogue waves incidents (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 10, 2026Checked Oct 12, 2026
“This list of rogue waves compiles incidents of known and likely rogue waves – also known as freak waves, monster waves, killer waves, and extreme waves. These are dangerous and rare ocean surface waves that unexpectedly reach at least twice the height of the tallest waves around them, and are often described by witnesses as "walls of water". They occur in deep water, usually far out at sea, and are a threat even to capital ships, ocean liners and land structures such as lighthouses.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 12, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 12, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
Open questions
How often is a given rogue wave caused by random superposition of steep waves versus crossing sea states, breaking behaviour, or modulational instability — and can these be told apart in field records?
No answers yet
How many rogue waves in high sea states have actually been measured directly by instruments, and would a larger set of direct measurements change which event counts as the most extreme?
No answers yet
How well does the spectral-forecast risk parameter for rogue waves perform in practice across different regions and sea states?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.