How do wildfires burn underground and how are they extinguished?
Fires can smoulder underground in peat and roots, survive winter, and reignite later, making them hard to find and bigger climate emitters than expected.
Covers: The science of smouldering peat and root-zone fires (often called zombie fires or holdover fires), why they persist through winter, their emissions and detection, and the methods and challenges of extinguishing them. Does not cover surface wildfire behaviour, firefighting career advice, or home wildfire preparedness.
Also answers: What are zombie fires and how do they burn underground? · How do underground wildfires keep burning through winter? · How are smouldering peat fires put out? · Why do wildfires burn underground?
- One page for this question6 other ways of asking lead here
- 5 independent sourcesEvery claim links to what supports it
- Joins the mapLinked as related pages appear
- Clean discussionScreened before anything appears
The short answer
Evidence-backed AI-prepared starting mapSome wildfires keep burning underground long after the flames at the surface are gone. In carbon-rich soils such as peat, and in tree root systems, fire smoulders without a visible flame, can survive cold and snow, and can reignite surface fires the following year. Siberian fires burned over 107 million hectares between 2001 and 2023, with peat fires accounting for up to one-third of that area and emitting 1.24 ± 0.06 petagrams of carbon — far more than conventional datasets estimate. Overwintering of late-season 2020 peat fires substantially contributed to the extensive fires of 2021.12
- Evidence 19
- Interpretation 2
Did this answer your question?
Be the first to voteIn brief
Heavy snowfall does not put them out; in experiments, only a snow layer of at least 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures extinguished a shallow smouldering peat fire.4
Evidence-backedPeat fires punch above their area: up to one-third of over 107 million hectares burned in Siberia (2001–2023) was peat, emitting 1.24 ± 0.06 petagrams of carbon, far above conventional estimates.1
Evidence-backedBecause the fire is invisible, finding it is half the battle — drones are being used to locate hot spots still burning beneath the ground after surface flames are gone.2
Evidence-backedWalking over a root fire is dangerous: the extreme heat can make the soil collapse under people and animals.3
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
107 million hectares
- peat fire emissions1.24 petagrams of carbon
- conventional datasets0.06 petagrams of carbon
peat fire emissions is about 21 times conventional datasets.
9 cm
The evidence behind it
5 sources- Other studies and data2
- Background3
Published in 2025 and 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| How drones are hunting fires hidden beneath the Cairngorms | Background | 2026 |
| Peat fires contribute disproportionately to Siberian fire carbon emissions. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Impact of Snow on Underground Smoldering Wildfire in Arctic-Boreal Peatlands. | Other studies and data | 2025 |
| Root fire (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
| Peat (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
The community around it
No one has added to this page yet. Firsthand experience, a newer study or a different reading of the numbers would show up here, credited to you.
Shares and multiples are worked out from the figures the page states.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you are walking or camping in an area where a recent fire burned, especially off-trail
treat ground that looks like smouldering ash with caution: root fires burn underneath, and the extreme heat can collapse the soil underfoot.3
Evidence-backedIf you assume winter snow has ended a peat fire
do not count on it: heavy natural snowfall did not suppress a shallow smouldering peat fire in experiments, and overwintering peat fires contributed substantially to the following year's Siberian fire season.41
Evidence-backedIf you are trying to locate a fire that appears to be out
look for heat rather than flame — drones were used in the Cairngorms to hunt hot spots still burning beneath the earth after the visible flames disappeared.2
Evidence-backedIf you are weighing how much a peat fire matters for the climate
weigh it by carbon, not by area: peat fires were up to one-third of the burned area in Siberia but emitted 1.24 ± 0.06 petagrams of carbon, far exceeding conventional estimates.1
Evidence-backedIf you are in or managing Arctic or boreal peatland
expect heightened risk in anomalously dry and warm seasons, since these conditions are the primary driver of extreme peat fire seasons and these fires threaten permafrost stability and its carbon stocks.1
Evidence-backedThe full story · 4 chapters
01
How fires burn underground
AI summary:Peat and tree roots can burn underground without visible flame, and the heat can collapse soil underfoot.
Evidence-backed: Peat is an accumulation of partially decayed vegetation that forms in waterlogged, oxygen-poor conditions, where flooding or stagnant water slows decomposition. It is the characteristic soil of peatlands — bogs, mires, moors and muskegs — and is rich in organic matter, with sphagnum moss a common component. Because it is essentially stored plant carbon, peat can burn as a fuel when it dries.5
Evidence-backed: A root fire, also called a ground fire, is a wildfire caused by the burning of tree roots. It is triggered by underground burns, generally started by off-trail camping or other causes. Because it burns below the surface, its smoke can look like nothing more than the smouldering wake of a forest fire. Root fires are similar to peat fires and share the same function of maximising the risk and spread of wildfires; peat fires can cause even more environmental damage because of their composition, affecting the environment, atmosphere, and local flora and fauna.3
Evidence-backed: Underground fires are dangerous in a way surface fires are not: the extreme heat can cause the soil to collapse if people or animals tread over them, and they can reignite a wildfire or cause other natural hazards.3
02
Surviving winter and reigniting
AI summary:Snow does not reliably put these fires out, and overwintering peat fires can feed the next year's blazes.
Evidence-backed: Snow does not reliably put these fires out. In outdoor experiments at subzero temperatures (−5 ± 5 °C), even heavy natural snowfall — a maximum water-equivalent intensity of 1.1 mm/h, or 7.9 mm of water equivalent accumulated over 24 hours — could not suppress a shallow smouldering peat fire. A thick snow cover can extract heat from the burning front underneath, and the minimum snow thickness that extinguished the peat fire was 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures, matching a theoretical analysis. Larger 1.5 × 1.5 m² field demonstrations validated the small-scale results.4
Evidence-backed: Overwintering matters at landscape scale. In Siberia, the overwintering of late-season peat fires from 2020 substantially contributed to the extensive fires of 2021, and anomalous dry and warm climatic conditions were the primary driver of extreme peat fire seasons. Peat fires, especially in Arctic regions, show a pronounced sensitivity to extreme weather, threatening the stability of permafrost peatlands and their large carbon stocks.1
Evidence-backed: The Cairngorms case shows the same pattern in a temperate setting: the dramatic flames of the July wildfire disappeared, but hot spots can continue to burn beneath the earth, which is why drones are being used to hunt for them.2
03
Emissions and finding hidden hot spots
AI summary:Peat fires cover a small share of burned area but emit far more carbon than usual estimates, so drones hunt for hidden heat.
Evidence-backed: Peat fires contribute disproportionately to carbon emissions. Satellite-derived 30-metre maps of burned area and peatland coverage show that Siberian fires burned over 107 million hectares between 2001 and 2023, with peat fires accounting for up to one-third of that area. Those peat fires emitted 1.24 ± 0.06 petagrams of carbon, largely exceeding conventional datasets' estimates. Arctic and boreal fires are critical threats to terrestrial carbon reservoirs, with peat fires triggering long-term irrecoverable carbon losses and permafrost thaw.1
Evidence-backed: Because the flames are gone but the heat remains, detection shifts from spotting fire to finding warmth under the ground. In the Cairngorms, drones are being used to hunt for fires hidden beneath the earth after the visible blaze has ended.2
04
Extinguishing them
AI summary:Cooling the burning front deeply enough can extinguish a shallow peat fire, but finding the invisible heat comes first.
Interpretation: The snow experiments point to a physical principle for suppression: removing heat from the burning front. A snow layer of at least 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures was enough to extinguish a shallow smouldering peat fire, while heavy snowfall alone was not. This suggests that depth of cooling, not merely the presence of cold or water at the surface, is what matters — but the finding comes from shallow, small-scale experiments and has not been demonstrated as a practical suppression technique at landscape scale.4
Interpretation: The practical difficulty is that the fire is invisible and may be spread across a large area. Root fires burn underground with smoke that can be indistinguishable from the aftermath of a surface fire, and they can reignite a wildfire. Peat fires share this behaviour and can cause even greater environmental harm. Detecting where the heat actually is — as with drone surveys in the Cairngorms — is therefore a precondition for putting it out.32
Your turn
Have your say
See where others stand. Join free to add your perspective. One answer per account.
How do you feel about this?
No votes yetQuick questions from connected pages
Before you go
What to remember
Try to recall each hidden figure before you reveal it. Remembering, not rereading, is what makes it stick.
Heavy snowfall does not put them out; in experiments, only a snow layer of at least ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures extinguished a shallow smouldering peat fire.
Peat fires punch above their area: up to one-third of over million hectares burned in Siberia (2001–2023) was peat, emitting 1.24 ± 0.06 petagrams of carbon, far above conventional estimates.
Underground fires smoulder in peat and tree roots without visible flame, and can survive winter to reignite the following year.
Your reading
0 of 4 chaptersThis answer keeps changing
When new evidence or a better source comes in, this page is updated (it's on version 2, last changed 55 minutes ago). Follow it to be told when that happens.
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1Peat fires contribute disproportionately to Siberian fire carbon emissions.Science advances (Khairoun et al.)Published Mar 18, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Arctic and boreal fires are critical threats to terrestrial carbon reservoirs, particularly peat fires that trigger long-term irrecoverable carbon losses and permafrost thaw. However, the occurrence of peat fires and their associated carbon emissions remain highly uncertain. 30-meter satellite-derived maps of burned area and peatland coverage reveal that Siberian fires burned over 107 million hectares during the 2001 to 2023 period, with peat fires accounting for up to one-third of this area. These peat fires emitted 1.24 ± 0.06 petagram of carbon, largely exceeding conventional datasets' estimates. We found that anomalous dry and warm climatic conditions represent the primary driver of extreme peat fire seasons and that overwintering of 2020's late-season peat fires substantially contributed to extensive fires of 2021. Peat fires, especially those in Arctic regions, exhibit a pronounced sensitivity to extreme weather, posing a critical threat to the stability of permafrost peatlands and their large carbon stocks.”
- 2How drones are hunting fires hidden beneath the CairngormsBBC NewsPublished Oct 10, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Dramatic flames from the huge Cairngorms wildfire in July have disappeared - but hot spots can continue to burn beneath the earth.”
- 3Root fire (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Sep 29, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“A root fire (also known as a ground fire) is a wildfire caused by the burning of tree roots. It is a wildfire caused through underground burns generally triggered by off-trail camping or other causes. They can pose an often overlooked dangerous threat. Because a root fire burns underground, its smoke may appear just as smouldering indistinguishable from the wake of a forest fire. These fires can reignite a wildfire or cause other natural hazards, and are also dangerous to humans and animals if trodden over, because the extreme heat can cause the soil to collapse. Root fires are similar to peat fires, and have the same function in maximizing the risk and spread of wildfires. Peat fires, however, can cause even more environmental issues due to their composition, impacting the environment, atmosphere, and flora and fauna where they occur.”
- 4Impact of Snow on Underground Smoldering Wildfire in Arctic-Boreal Peatlands.Environmental science & technology (Qin et al.)Published Feb 6, 2025Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Despite the critical role of fire-snow interactions in these processes, our understanding of them remains limited. Herein, we conducted small-scale outdoor experiments (20 × 20 × 20 cm3) at subzero temperatures (-5 ± 5 °C) to investigate the impact of natural snowfall and accumulated snow layers (up to 20 cm thick) on shallow smoldering peat fires. We found that even heavy natural snowfalls (a maximum water equivalent snowfall intensity of 1.1 mm/h or a 24 h accumulated snowfall water equivalent precipitation of 7.9 mm) cannot suppress a shallow smoldering peat fire. A thick snow cover on the peat surface can extract heat from the burning front underneath, and the minimum thickness of the snow layer to extinguish the peat fire was found to be 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures, agreeing well with the theoretical analysis. Furthermore, larger-scale field demonstrations (1.5 × 1.5 m2) were conducted to validate the small-scale experimental phenomena. This work helps us to understand the interactions between fire and snow and reveals the persistence of smoldering wildfires under cold environments.”
- 5Peat (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 7, 2026Checked Oct 10, 2026
“Peat is an accumulation of partially decayed vegetation or organic matter. It is unique to natural areas called peatlands, bogs, mires, moors, or muskegs. Sphagnum moss, also called peat moss, is one of the most common components in peat, although many other plants can contribute. The biological features of sphagnum mosses act to create a habitat aiding peat formation, a phenomenon termed 'habitat manipulation'. Soils consisting primarily of peat are known as histosols. Peat forms in wetland conditions, where flooding or stagnant water obstructs the flow of oxygen from the atmosphere, slowing the rate of decomposition. Peat properties such as organic matter content and saturated hydraulic conductivity can exhibit high spatial heterogeneity. Peatlands, particularly bogs, are the primary source of peat; although less common, other wetlands, including fens, pocosins and peat swamp forests, also deposit peat. Landscapes covered in peat are home to specific kinds of plants, including Sphagnum moss, ericaceous shrubs and sedges.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 10, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 10, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
“Extinguishing them” has no evidence or firsthand experience yet
It's a synthesis for now. Evidence or experience would show whether it holds.
Open questions
Beyond cooling with thick snow, which suppression methods actually extinguish deep peat or root fires in the field, and how are they verified?
No answers yet
How long can a smouldering peat or root fire persist before it either dies out or reignites a surface fire?
No answers yet
How reliable are drones and other thermal or satellite methods at locating underground hot spots, and what do they miss?
No answers yet
How often do root fires start from off-trail camping or other causes, and how often do they reignite wildfires?
No answers yet
How much does permafrost thaw caused by peat fires feed back into future fire risk and carbon release?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.