How do underground peat fires keep burning after a wildfire is out?
Peat fires keep burning underground after the flames die because smouldering creeps through the soil, and moisture loss is what lets it start.
Covers: Explains the physical and chemical reasons peat can smoulder underground for weeks or months after surface flames are extinguished, including oxygen supply, moisture, heat retention and soil structure. Does not cover firefighting tactics in detail or specific wildfire case histories.
Also answers: Why do peat fires keep burning underground? · How can peat fires smoulder for months? · What makes underground peat fires so hard to put out? · Underground peat fire persistence after wildfire
- One page for this question6 other ways of asking lead here
- 7 independent sourcesEvery claim links to what supports it
- 2 connected pages2 changed this week
- Clean discussionScreened before anything appears
Before you read, make a guess
Fill in the blank: ?% of emissions from the 2025 Scottish megafire that came from peat combustion
Drag the slider to fill in the blank
The short answer
Evidence-backed AI-prepared starting mapPeat fires persist after surface flames die because the burning shifts from flaming to smouldering: a flameless, slow combustion that creeps through the organic soil itself. Smouldering dominates the residual burning after flames have died out, is difficult to detect and suppress, and in peatlands produces the largest fires on Earth (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1). Peat is an accumulation of partially decayed vegetation formed in waterlogged conditions where flooding or stagnant water obstructs oxygen flow and slows decomposition (384b785c-440f-4a3f-b73f-a1f73956c506); once that moisture is lost, the same carbon-rich material becomes fuel that can burn below the surface.12
- Evidence 21
- Interpretation 2
Did this answer your question?
Be the first to voteIn brief
After surface flames are out, peat fires persist as smouldering: flameless combustion that creeps through the organic soil, dominates residual burning, and is hard to detect and suppress (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1).1
Evidence-backedMoisture is the key control: the probability of peat substrate combustion falls as moisture rises, and drainage or mining that dries peat more than doubles burning risk (c41a2db6-490f-46c6-813a-67130d191e84).3
Evidence-backedCold and snow are weak suppressants: heavy snowfall did not stop a shallow smouldering peat fire, and about 9 ± 1 cm of snow cover was needed to extinguish it at subzero temperatures (21e7e12f-83ea-4c9f-a9a0-514b993b607b).4
Evidence-backedPeat composition and depth matter: tropical peat resists ignition more than peat from other regions, and that resistance increases with depth (ba063022-2d11-4979-b833-c752cda2c645).5
Evidence-backedThe stakes are large: in the 2025 Scottish megafire, peat combustion contributed nearly 85% of 38,600 MgC emitted, and recovery can take decades to centuries (e9b1c17d-eaa5-45f7-bf60-30c5d9a1ff38).6
Evidence-backed
At a glance
The picture in numbers
Live · updated just now
85%
85 in every 100
38,600 MgC
9 cm
7.9 mm
The evidence behind it
7 sources- Other studies and data5
- Background2
When it was published
Newest from 2026
| Source | Kind | Year |
|---|---|---|
| How drones are hunting fires hidden beneath the Cairngorms | Background | 2026 |
| Conserving mire ecosystems: linking flammability and moisture content of peaty substrates. | Other studies and data | 2025 |
| Tropical peat composition may provide a negative feedback on fire occurrence and severity. | Other studies and data | 2024 |
| Smouldering wildfires in peatlands, forests and the arctic: Challenges and perspectives. | Other studies and data | 2021 |
| Impact of Snow on Underground Smoldering Wildfire in Arctic-Boreal Peatlands. | Other studies and data | 2025 |
| Widespread peat carbon losses driven by the 2025 Scottish megafire. | Other studies and data | 2026 |
| Peat (Wikipedia) | Background | Unknown |
The community around it
No one has added to this page yet. Firsthand experience, a newer study or a different reading of the numbers would show up here, credited to you.
What it means for you
Which fits you?
Pick the situation closest to yours. Each answer says what it rests on.
If you want to know why flames are gone but the ground is still hot
the fire has likely transitioned from flaming to smouldering, which dominates residual burning after flames die out and is difficult to detect and suppress (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1).1
Evidence-backedIf you are assessing fire risk on peatland that has been drained or otherwise dried
expect substantially higher burning risk: underground mining more than doubled the risk of substrate burning for all ignition types tested, and disturbances that reduce substrate moisture increase fire risk (c41a2db6-490f-46c6-813a-67130d191e84).3
Evidence-backedIf you assume winter cold or snowfall has put out an underground peat fire
do not rely on it: heavy natural snowfall did not suppress a shallow smouldering peat fire, and roughly 9 ± 1 cm of snow cover was needed to extinguish it at subzero temperatures (21e7e12f-83ea-4c9f-a9a0-514b993b607b).4
Evidence-backedIf you are comparing peat types or depths for ignition resistance
tropical peat has higher resistance to ignition than peat from other regions, and resistance increases with depth, so exposed deeper layers may be less ignitable (ba063022-2d11-4979-b833-c752cda2c645).5
Evidence-backedIf you are estimating the climate cost of a peatland fire
expect peat combustion to dominate emissions: in the 2025 Scottish megafire it contributed nearly 85% of 38,600 MgC emitted, with recovery taking decades to centuries (e9b1c17d-eaa5-45f7-bf60-30c5d9a1ff38).6
Evidence-backedIf you are trying to locate a peat fire that has gone quiet on the surface
look below ground rather than at the surface: hot spots can continue to burn beneath the earth after visible flames disappear, which is why drones are used to hunt hidden fires (22c87c30-9ab7-40d7-b75b-2d5cc8b81d75).7
Evidence-backedThe full story · 4 chapters
01
Why the fire goes underground
AI summary:Fires can shift from flaming to smouldering, and peat's thick carbon-rich layer keeps feeding a burn front below the surface.
Evidence-backed: Wildfires are divided into flaming and smouldering types; both occur in most fires and one can transition into the other. Smouldering is fundamentally different in chemical and physical terms from flaming, is often misinterpreted, and has traditionally received less scientific attention than flames. It is emerging as a global concern because it causes extensive air pollution, emits very large amounts of carbon, is hard to detect and suppress, and could accelerate climate change (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1).1
Evidence-backed: The fuel itself is the reason the fire can leave the surface. Peat is partially decayed vegetation or organic matter, formed in wetland conditions where flooding or stagnant water obstructs the flow of oxygen from the atmosphere and slows decomposition. Sphagnum moss is a common component, and soils made mainly of peat are known as histosols (384b785c-440f-4a3f-b73f-a1f73956c506). In other words, peat is a thick, carbon-dense organic layer that can keep supplying fuel to a burn front below the ground.2
Evidence-backed: The Cairngorms case illustrates the pattern: the dramatic flames of the July wildfire disappeared, but hot spots can continue to burn beneath the earth, which is why drones are used to hunt for hidden fires (22c87c30-9ab7-40d7-b75b-2d5cc8b81d75).7
02
Moisture, oxygen and the thresholds for burning
AI summary:Wetter peat is less likely to burn, while drainage, mining and other moisture loss raise the risk of underground burning.
Evidence-backed: Moisture is the main control on whether peat substrate burns. In laboratory simulations using samples from four undisturbed mires in southeastern Australia, the probability of substrate combustion was negatively related to moisture levels for both smouldering and flaming ignition. With flaming ignition, high-intensity fire (75 kWm-2) carried an increased risk of burning at higher substrate moisture than moderate-intensity fire (35 kWm-2). Comparing moisture thresholds with field moisture conditions, underground mining more than doubled the risk of substrate burning for all ignition types, because disturbances that disrupt natural hydrological regimes and reduce substrate moisture raise fire risk (c41a2db6-490f-46c6-813a-67130d191e84).3
Evidence-backed: In a normal hydrological state, fire propagation risk is largely controlled by peat bulk density and moisture content. Where humans interfere with moisture status through drainage or indirectly through climate change, botanical composition becomes more important to flammability, and peats from different latitudes may differ in compositionally driven susceptibility to ignition (ba063022-2d11-4979-b833-c752cda2c645).5
Interpretation: Peat properties such as organic matter content and saturated hydraulic conductivity can be highly variable in space (384b785c-440f-4a3f-b73f-a1f73956c506), which helps explain why a fire can keep burning in one patch of ground while nearby ground stays wet enough to resist ignition.23
03
Heat retention, depth and composition
AI summary:Deeper tropical peat resists ignition more, and cold or snowfall only puts out a smouldering fire when the snow cover is thick enough.
Evidence-backed: Peat composition changes with depth in ways that affect how easily it ignites. Tropical peat has a higher temperature of maximum thermal decomposition (Tmax) than peat from other regions, likely because of its higher wood content, which appears to convey greater resistance to ignition. This resistance also increases with depth, so loss of surface peat in tropical regions may reduce the subsequent ignitability of deeper layers as they are exposed, potentially acting as a negative feedback on increased fire occurrence and severity (ba063022-2d11-4979-b833-c752cda2c645).5
Evidence-backed: Cold and snow do not reliably stop a smouldering peat fire. In small-scale outdoor experiments at subzero temperatures (-5 ± 5 °C), even heavy natural snowfall (maximum water equivalent intensity of 1.1 mm/h, or 7.9 mm accumulated over 24 hours) could not suppress a shallow smouldering peat fire. A thick snow cover can extract heat from the burning front underneath, and the minimum snow thickness needed to extinguish the fire was 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures, matching theoretical analysis; larger 1.5 × 1.5 m2 field demonstrations validated the small-scale results (21e7e12f-83ea-4c9f-a9a0-514b993b607b).4
Interpretation: Taken together, these findings suggest the persistence comes from a combination of factors: the peat body itself is the fuel, moisture loss opens the door to ignition, and the surrounding soil insulates the burn front so that surface conditions such as cold air or snowfall remove heat too slowly to put it out unless the cover is thick enough.432
04
How much carbon is at stake
AI summary:In the 2025 Scottish megafire, peat combustion produced most of the carbon emitted, and recovery can take decades to centuries.
Evidence-backed: The 2025 Scottish megafire spread rapidly and burned severely across peatlands with anomalously low soil moisture, emitting 38,600 MgC (range 25,200–119,000 MgC). Peat combustion contributed nearly 85% of total emissions, suggesting drier climates increase fire emissions from peat, which can require decades to centuries to recover (e9b1c17d-eaa5-45f7-bf60-30c5d9a1ff38).6
Evidence-backed: Loss of peat through increased burning has major impacts on the global carbon cycle (ba063022-2d11-4979-b833-c752cda2c645), and smouldering wildfires are a global concern precisely because they emit very large amounts of carbon and are difficult to detect and suppress (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1).51
How much do you know about how underground peat fires keep burning after a wildfire is out?
Join free to voteAlready a member? Sign inYour individual answer is private. Only totals are shown.
Your turn
Have your say
See where others stand. Join free to add your perspective. One answer per account.
How do you feel about this?
No votes yetQuick questions from connected pages
Before you go
What to remember
Try to recall each hidden figure before you reveal it. Remembering, not rereading, is what makes it stick.
Cold and snow are weak suppressants: heavy snowfall did not stop a shallow smouldering peat fire, and about ± 1 cm of snow cover was needed to extinguish it at subzero temperatures (21e7e12f-83ea-4c9f-a9a0-514b993b607b).
The stakes are large: in the 2025 Scottish megafire, peat combustion contributed nearly of 38,600 MgC emitted, and recovery can take decades to centuries (e9b1c17d-eaa5-45f7-bf60-30c5d9a1ff38).
After surface flames are out, peat fires persist as smouldering: flameless combustion that creeps through the organic soil, dominates residual burning, and is hard to detect and suppress (163a736b-7498-488b-9b75-5f563314ffa1).
Your reading
0 of 4 chaptersThis answer keeps changing
When new evidence or a better source comes in, this page is updated (it's on version 2, last changed 51 minutes ago). Follow it to be told when that happens.
Ask this Sylo
Still wondering about something?
Answers come only from this page's reviewed material, with citations, and say plainly when the page doesn't cover it yet.
Behind this page
Who's adding to it, where it comes from, how it changed and what would make it better. Always open to everyone.
Discussion
Sources
Numbers match the citations in the article. A working link isn't proof that a page supports a claim; check the quoted passage and date.
- 1Smouldering wildfires in peatlands, forests and the arctic: Challenges and perspectives.Current opinion in environmental science & health (Rein & Huang)Published Dec 1, 2021Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Wildfires can be divided into two types, flaming or smouldering, depending on the dominant combustion processes. Both types are present in most wildfires, and despite being fundamentally different in chemical and physical terms, one transitions to the other. Traditionally, science has focused on flames, while smouldering is often misinterpreted. But smouldering wildfires are emerging as a global concern because they cause extensive air pollution, emit very large amounts of carbon, are difficult to detect and suppress, and could accelerate climate change. Central to the topic are smouldering peat fires that lead to the largest fires on Earth. Smouldering also dominates the residual burning after flames have died out and firebrand ignition. Finally, smouldering is an important part of Arctic wildfires, which are increasing in frequency. Here, we present a scientific overview of smouldering wildfires, the associated environmental and health issues, including climate change, and the challenges in prevention and mitigation.”
- 2Peat (Wikipedia)WikipediaPublished Oct 10, 2026Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Peat is an accumulation of partially decayed vegetation or organic matter. It is unique to natural areas called peatlands, bogs, mires, moors, or muskegs. Sphagnum moss, also called peat moss, is one of the most common components in peat, although many other plants can contribute. The biological features of sphagnum mosses act to create a habitat aiding peat formation, a phenomenon termed 'habitat manipulation'. Soils consisting primarily of peat are known as histosols. Peat forms in wetland conditions, where flooding or stagnant water obstructs the flow of oxygen from the atmosphere, slowing the rate of decomposition. Peat properties such as organic matter content and saturated hydraulic conductivity can exhibit high spatial heterogeneity. Peatlands, particularly bogs, are the primary source of peat; although less common, other wetlands, including fens, pocosins and peat swamp forests, also deposit peat. Landscapes covered in peat are home to specific kinds of plants, including Sphagnum moss, ericaceous shrubs and sedges.”
- 3Conserving mire ecosystems: linking flammability and moisture content of peaty substrates.The Science of the total environment (Mason et al.)Published Oct 21, 2025Checked Oct 11, 2026
“We sought to quantify the change in combustion risk across moisture gradients. We used samples within four undisturbed mire locations in southeastern Australia. Prior to laboratory simulations, we measured moisture, bulk density and organic matter for each sample. We then applied smouldering or flaming (either 35 kWm-2 or 75 kWm-2 intensity) ignition and observed moisture thresholds for substrate combustion. We assessed the combustion risk associated with underground mining using field data from moisture probes deployed in mined and unmined mires. We found that the probability of substrate combustion was negatively related to moisture levels for both smouldering and flaming ignition types. In the case of flaming ignition, high intensity fire had increased risk of burning at higher substrate moisture than moderate-intensity fire. When we compared moisture thresholds for substrate combustion with field moisture conditions, we found that underground mining more than doubled the risk of substrate burning for all ignition types. Anthropogenic disturbances that disrupt natural hydrological regimes and reduce substrate moisture, concurrently increase fire risk in the landscape.”
- 4Impact of Snow on Underground Smoldering Wildfire in Arctic-Boreal Peatlands.Environmental science & technology (Qin et al.)Published Feb 6, 2025Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Despite the critical role of fire-snow interactions in these processes, our understanding of them remains limited. Herein, we conducted small-scale outdoor experiments (20 × 20 × 20 cm3) at subzero temperatures (-5 ± 5 °C) to investigate the impact of natural snowfall and accumulated snow layers (up to 20 cm thick) on shallow smoldering peat fires. We found that even heavy natural snowfalls (a maximum water equivalent snowfall intensity of 1.1 mm/h or a 24 h accumulated snowfall water equivalent precipitation of 7.9 mm) cannot suppress a shallow smoldering peat fire. A thick snow cover on the peat surface can extract heat from the burning front underneath, and the minimum thickness of the snow layer to extinguish the peat fire was found to be 9 ± 1 cm at subzero temperatures, agreeing well with the theoretical analysis. Furthermore, larger-scale field demonstrations (1.5 × 1.5 m2) were conducted to validate the small-scale experimental phenomena. This work helps us to understand the interactions between fire and snow and reveals the persistence of smoldering wildfires under cold environments.”
- 5Tropical peat composition may provide a negative feedback on fire occurrence and severity.Nature communications (Crawford et al.)Published Aug 27, 2024Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Loss of peat through increased burning will have major impacts on the global carbon cycle. In a normal hydrological state, the risk of fire propagation is largely controlled by peat bulk density and moisture content. However, where humans have interfered with the moisture status of peat either via drainage, or indirectly via climate change, we hypothesise that its botanical composition will become important to flammability, such that peats from different latitudes might have different compositionally-driven susceptibility to ignition. We use pyrolysis combustion flow calorimetry to determine the temperature of maximum thermal decomposition (Tmax) of peats from different latitudes, and couple this to a botanical composition analysis. We find that tropical peat has higher Tmax than other regions, likely on account of its higher wood content which appears to convey a greater resistance to ignition. This resistance also increases with depth, which means that loss of surface peat in tropical regions may lead to a reduction in the subsequent ignitability of deeper peat layers as they are exposed, potentially resulting in a negative feedback on increased fire occurrence and severity.”
- 6Widespread peat carbon losses driven by the 2025 Scottish megafire.Nature geoscience (Schoenecker et al.)Published May 20, 2026Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Drier and warmer climates have allowed fires to increasingly burn carbon-dense peatland ecosystems. Here we document a 2025 Scottish megafire in the UK, which spread rapidly and burned severely across peatlands in Scotland with anomalously low soil moisture, emitting 38,600 MgC (25,200-119,000 MgC). Peat combustion contributed nearly 85% of total emissions, suggesting drier climates increase fire emissions from peat, which can require decades to centuries to recover.”
- 7How drones are hunting fires hidden beneath the CairngormsBBC NewsPublished Oct 10, 2026Checked Oct 11, 2026
“Dramatic flames from the huge Cairngorms wildfire in July have disappeared - but hot spots can continue to burn beneath the earth.”
How it changed
Published 1 time since Oct 11, 2026.
- Version 2Oct 11, 2026Live now
AI-prepared Starting Map from live research.
- First published version.
Help improve it
The brief is open about what's uncertain. These are the specific gaps that new material would fill.
Open questions
How does oxygen actually reach a smouldering front deep in peat, and how do soil structure and cracks control that supply over weeks or months?
No answers yet
What ultimately stops an underground peat fire when nothing is done — fuel exhaustion, rising moisture, or something else — and over what timescale?
No answers yet
Does the 9 ± 1 cm snow-extinction threshold hold for deeper or larger peat fires, and for wetter snow or repeated snowfall events?
No answers yet
Do the composition and depth effects seen in tropical peat apply to temperate and boreal peats such as those in Scotland or the Cairngorms?
No answers yet
Around this topic
Sylos connect: narrower topics report up to broader ones, so what's learned in one place shows up where it matters.